Skip to main content

The Telecom Industry Post Chevron- What It Means for your Business

With the Supreme Court’s recent decision to overrule Chevron deference, coupled with its other decisions addressing the review of agency decisions, telecom regulations and policies now face increased judicial scrutiny, leading to more litigation and uncertainty. 

In their webinar “The Telecom Industry Post Chevron – What It Means for your Business”, Communications Infrastructure Litigation Chair T. Scott Thompson, Technology, Communications & Media Chair Angela Kung, and Member Daniel Reing explored the implications of the decision for the telecom industry, and offered insights on how companies can adapt to this significant change. 

The attorneys set the stage and examined the details of four key cases: Ohio et al. v. Environmental Protection Agency, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Jarkesy et al., Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, and Corner Post, Inc. v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

Discussing the potential impact on current and future appeals, and noting that there are currently 40 pending appeals of FCC actions, the attorneys highlighted that the impact of Loper Bright depends on which part of the Communications Act (or other statute) is in question and clarified that Corner Post should have little impact on FCC appeals, as they fall under the Hobbs Act.

The potential ramifications on commission proceedings were explained, indicating that we might see parties litigating issues that have historically been accepted within the FCC’s authority, particularly in areas like spectrum policy.

The webinar concluded with Members sharing insight into how companies and practitioners should approach advocacy in the post-Chevron landscape.

This is the second installment in a series of Mintz-hosted webinars titled “Deciding Factors: Analyzing the Recent Supreme Court Term.” The series focuses on the effects of the Court’s recent decisions (including Ohio v. EPA and Loper Bright) and their impact on heavily regulated industries and the federal regulatory agencies that govern them. Additional dates and times are forthcoming.

Subscribe To Viewpoints

Authors

Angela Y. Kung

Member / Chair, Technology, Communications & Media Practice

Angela Y. Kung draws on significant knowledge of the wireless regulatory landscape and experience at the FCC to advise clients on FCC rules and procedures. With particular expertise on spectrum use policies and auction procedures, she has shepherded Mintz's clients through several FCC auctions related to next-generation 5G wireless technologies and routinely advocates on behalf of clients to help ensure that the agency’s rules align with their interests.
Daniel Reing is a Member in the Mintz Technology, Communications & Media Practice who provides strategic regulatory and litigation counsel to benefit companies in the communications industry. Clients in the cable, broadband, and wireless sectors rely on Dan’s counsel to help advance key projects and achieve their goals.

T. Scott Thompson

Member / Chair, Communications Infrastructure Litigation Practice

Scott serves as Chair of Mintz’s Communications Infrastructure Litigation Practice and represents clients in legal, regulatory, and policy matters involving telecommunications networks.