On behalf of a chain of urgent care clinics throughout New England, favorably resolved alleged False Claims Act violations and claimed wrongful termination of a whistleblower in a. qui tam suit without admission of any wrongdoing or imposition of a corporate integrity agreement (CIA). Avoided prosecution in an investigation for alleged infiltration of a government computer network.
Settled two civil qui tam False Claims Act and California False Claims Act investigations (jointly prosecuted by the DOJ and California AG) on behalf of a hospital system alleging causing the improper submission of claims for payment from the California Medicaid program.
Represented Wynn Resorts and its top executives in connection with the investigation by the Massachusetts attorney general and state police related to the development of the Encore Boston Harbor Casino just outside Boston.
Successfully defended three executives of a nonprofit health care facility in an investigation by the Charities Bureau of the New York State Attorney General’s Office, which focused on claims of alleged misuse of funds, deficient financial controls, failure to take corrective action, patient abuse, and self-dealing. Mintz convinced the AG to close the investigation without charges or penalties. The organization’s executives were absolved of liability and allowed to continue employment.
Avoided all charges in an investigation of an automobile dealership for alleged predatory lending and fraud.
Favorably resolved allegations of large-scale Medicaid fraud on behalf of a home health company without a judgment against any corporate officers.
Represented a financial institution during a multiyear investigation for money laundering and fraud conspiracy without any charges brought against the corporation or any individuals.
Represented a parochial school in connection with an investigation of wrongdoing by a school employee.
Represented a telecommunications company in connection with alleged violations of consumer protection statutes. There were no charges or sanctions against our client.
Represented a nonprofit educational institution in a joint state and federal pension fraud investigation. There were no charges against our client.
Resolved an investigation of a technology company that provided services to a state Department of Public Safety (DPS) and Executive Office of Public Safety and Security (EOPSS) alleging violations of the False Claims Act.
Resolved various criminal and civil investigations by a state attorney general and the US Department of Justice related to Boston’s “Big Dig” construction projects.
Represented an individual sued by the Massachusetts attorney general for various acts of alleged discrimination against customers at his retail establishment, ultimately settling the matter for money damages without an admission of wrongdoing.
Represented two construction companies defending against a False Claims Act investigation by a state attorney general’s office related to the construction of a sports facility and failure to utilize minority-owned subcontractors. Resolved the case prior to litigation on favorable financial terms, with no admission of liability.
We routinely represent “subjects” or “witnesses” in attorney general investigations in responding to Civil Investigative Demands (CIDs) or subpoenas for documents or testimony.
Favorably represented a skilled nursing facility in a billing inquiry investigation by the Arkansas AG.
