Skip to main content

Sustainable Energy & Infrastructure Litigation Updates — February 2025

Following a bench trial, on January 10, 2025, Judge Reed O’Connor of the US District Court of the Northern District of Texas held that the managers of a company’s 401(k) retirement plans had breached their fiduciary duty by allowing their investment decisions to be impacted by ESG interests. Specifically, the court held that “[w]hile it is permissible to consider ESG risks when done through a strictly financial lens . . . ESG cannot stand on its own. . . . [as] ERISA does not permit a fiduciary to pursue a non-pecuniary interest no matter how noble it might view the aim.” This is the first decision to consider whether ESG-focused investing of a 401(k) plan was in accordance with fiduciary duty principles, and the finding by the court that such actions constituted a breach of fiduciary duty will likely influence both other lawsuits and industry players.

 

Subscribe To Viewpoints

Author

Jacob H. Hupart is Co-Chair of the ESG Practice Group and a Member in the firm’s Litigation Section. He has a multifaceted litigation practice that encompasses complex commercial litigation, securities litigation — including class action claims — as well as white collar criminal defense and regulatory investigations. His clients sit in a variety of industries, including energy, financial services, education, health care, and the media.