Monthly TCPA Digest — June 2020

We are pleased to present our latest Monthly TCPA Digest, providing insights and news related to the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). This month we cover the Ninth Circuit’s recent N.L. v. Credit One Bank ruling that a bank’s placement of 189 automated calls to an unintended recipient, though resulting from a mix-up, violated the TCPA. The decision serves as a reminder that prior express consent must come from the party to whom the phone number is assigned.

In our Regulatory Update, we report on the FCC’s continuing, small steps to implement portions of the TRACED Act and extend protections against illegal and unwanted robocalls.

If you have suggestions for topics you’d like us to feature in this newsletter, or any questions about the content in this issue, please feel free to reach out to an attorney on Mintz’s TCPA and Consumer Calling Practice team.

In This Edition

Part I – TCPA Litigation Update

• Ninth Circuit Determines TCPA Violation in N.L. v. Credit One Bank

Part II – TCPA Regulatory Update

• FCC Reviews Comments on STIR/SHAKEN Implementation; Other Call Blocking Issues

Subscribe To Viewpoints