Skip to main content

Telephone and Texting Compliance News — September 2024

We are pleased to present our latest edition of Telephone and Texting Compliance News, providing insights and news related to the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). In this month’s Regulatory Update, we discuss a Report and Order the FCC was set to consider at its September 26 meeting that will instead be circulated to commissioners for individual voting. The Report and Order encompasses a draft Eighth Report and Order that would expand and add call-blocking requirements for some providers and a Third Report and Order that would impose new text message blocking obligations on originating providers and require e-mail-to-text to be an opt-in service. However, as drafted, the Report and Order would not require providers to offer call or text blocking based on analytics. Nor would it require the display of caller name information when caller ID has been authenticated on a consumer device or impose authentication and traceback requirements for text messages.

In this month’s Litigation Update, we cover a Florida federal court’s dismissal of a TCPA class action involving a text message and calls stemming from the plaintiff’s disclosure of her phone number during a store survey. The plaintiff, who apparently completed the survey to get a chance to win a gift card, claimed her number was registered on the National Do Not Call (DNC) Registry. In a significant win for TCPA defendants, the court held that the plaintiff had given prior express permission by providing her phone number and agreeing to the terms presented. In its analysis, the court concluded that claims based on TCPA language and its regulations regulating calls made to numbers on the DNC Registry do not require the same level of written consent required for claims premised on language about advertisements.

If you have suggestions for topics you’d like us to feature in this newsletter, or any questions about the content in this issue, please feel free to reach out to an attorney on Mintz’s TCPA and Consumer Calling Practice team.

In This Edition

Regulatory Update

Litigation Update

 

 

Subscribe To Viewpoints

Authors

Russell H. Fox is a wireless communications attorney at Mintz. He guides clients through federal legislative, regulatory, and transactional matters. Russell also participates in FCC proceedings, negotiates spectrum agreements, and represents clients in spectrum auctions.
Jonathan Garvin is an attorney at Mintz who focuses on legal challenges facing companies in the communications and media industries. He advises clients on transactional, regulatory, and compliance issues before the FCC involving wireless, broadband, broadcast, and cable matters.

Joshua Briones

Member / Managing Member, Los Angeles Office

Joshua Briones is a commercial litigator who defends consumer class actions for Mintz. He's represented clients in a wide range of industries, including financial services, life sciences, manufacturing, and retail, in cases involving false advertising, unfair trade practices, and other claims.
Esteban Morales is a Mintz litigator who handles class action defense and financial services litigation for companies of all sizes. He defends clients targeted in class action suits, and the results include dismissals at the pleading stage. Esteban practices in Mintz's Sports Law Practice.
Grecia A. Rivas-Rudra is an Associate at Mintz who focuses her practice on complex commercial litigation, with an emphasis on disputes involving public and private construction, and government contracting matters. She has experience with litigation, bid protests, and compliance and enforcement matters relating to construction projects.