Esteban is a class action and consumer defense lawyer. Esteban routinely handles litigation and compliance issues related to marketing, consumer outreach, allegations of consumer fraud, and privacy.
Esteban has successfully defended both small and large corporate clients targeted in class actions alleging violations of various federal and state statutes, including the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (and state mini TCPAs), Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act, Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, California’s Unfair Competition Law, and California’s Invasion of Privacy Act (among many other statutes and theories). Results include potential plaintiffs abandoning claims during pre-suit discussions, dismissals at the pleading stage and without any discovery following aggressive defense strategies, and prevailing at summary judgment. In addition to defending class actions, Esteban has represented clients in corporate, real estate, trust and estate, and securities disputes.
Before joining the firm, Esteban served as in-house Counsel for a national broker-dealer with thousands of registered representatives stationed throughout the country. In his capacity as an in-house attorney, Esteban litigated cases, routinely interfaced with insurance carriers and brokers, managed outside counsel, and advised on regulatory matters.
Esteban has been featured in The American Lawyer for his pro bono work with immigrant youth seeking Special Immigrant Juvenile Status. Esteban also previously practiced at an international law firm and was an extern for the Honorable Dale S. Fischer, US District Court, Central District of California.
Experience
Telephone Consumer Protection Act and State Mini-TCPAs
- Motion to Dismiss granted with prejudice (no discovery) in TCPA class action filed against a major NBA franchise.
- Summary judgment granted in favor of software company providing solutions for the travel industry in class action alleging TCPA violations. Decision affirmed by the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
- Motion to Dismiss granted with prejudice (no discovery) in case alleging TCPA violations. Decision affirmed by the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in what is believed to be the first substantive decision from the Ninth Circuit applying the residential standard from Chenette v. Porch.com, Inc., 50 F.4th 1217 (9th Cir. 2022).
- Voluntary dismissal of TCPA class action (no discovery) following filing of two motions to dismiss challenging jurisdiction, opposition to a motion to transfer and service of a Rule 11 motion for sanctions.
- Motion to dismiss granted in class action alleging violations of the Confidentiality of Medical Information Act, UCL, and TCPA.
- Responded to state regulator in connection with consumer complaint alleging TCPA violations. Response resulted in no action from the regulator.
- Voluntary dismissal of TCPA class action alleged against auto dealership network following investigation confirming consent.
- Voluntary dismissal of TCPA case following agreement to arbitrate and investigation confirming no revocation of consent.
- Successfully resolved numerous TCPA claims pre-litigation.
- Defended mini-TCPA claims pre-litigation and in formal litigation (including theories premised on the Florida Telephone Solicitation Act, Oklahoma Telephone Solicitation Act, and Massachusetts, Maryland, Washington, Missouri, Colorado, and Indiana statutes).
- Successfully represented multinational cloud computing company and secured favorable class settlement, with no admission of wrongdoing, resolving TCPA and Maryland mini-TCPA claims for a gross amount of $5.06 per class member.
- Provided pre-litigation compliance counseling to numerous companies in connection with potential text messaging, calling, and faxing projects. Examples include assisting fast-food chain with development of TCPA-compliant procedures in connection with text messaging project and advising genomic testing company in connection with potential faxing and text messaging projects.
California Invasion of Privacy Act
- Motion to dismiss granted in a class action filed against an app developer claiming an app functioned as a tracking device. Theories included alleged violations of the California Invasion of Privacy Act, Cellular Communications Interception Act, California Constitution, Intrusion Upon Seclusion, and California Consumers Legal Remedies Act.
- Demurrer granted in California Invasion of Privacy Act class action against national retailer.
- Resolved California Invasion of Privacy Act class action pre-discovery on favorable terms.
Transportation-Related Consumer Disputes
- Summary judgment granted in favor of tolling authority in consolidated class action (which originated as three separate class actions) alleging excessive fines under the U.S. Constitution. Prior to summary judgment, obtained dismissal of nearly all theories alleged against tolling authority, including under the New York General Business Law, secured voluntary dismissal of claims against affiliated authority, and obtained bifurcation of merits and class discovery.
- Voluntary dismissal of class action alleging misclassifications against a tolling authority following filing of motion to dismiss.
- Motion to dismiss granted in favor of public transportation authority in class action alleging violations of the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act.
- Resolved tolling-related disputes against tolling authority on favorable terms.
Consumer Collection, Financial, and Credit-Related Claims
- Secured pre-discovery voluntary dismissal in class action alleging Fair Credit Report Act violations.
- Secured voluntary dismissal of arbitration claims against a creditor premised on violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, Florida Consumer Collection Practices Act, and TCPA after successfully opposing the claimant's bid for summary disposition.
- Successfully defended Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act class action that was voluntarily dismissed and no longer pursued following removal to federal court.
- Successfully defended creditor and resolved case on favorable terms alleging California Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and Fair Debt Collection Practices Act claims.
- Successfully defended creditor and resolved case alleging Texas Debt Collection Act claim on favorable terms.
Email Consumer Claims
- Defended several cases alleging violations under California Business and Professions Code § 17529.5 and resolved them on favorable terms.
- Resolved several Section 17529.5 claims pre-litigation on favorable terms.
- Advised health clinic regarding email best practices to limit potential exposure.
Other Consumer and Privacy Class Actions
- Resolved Americans with Disabilities Act class action on favorable terms to our client.
- Resolved Biometric Information Privacy Act class action on favorable terms following early challenge to the named plaintiff's adequacy.
Securities
- Managed litigation (including numerous FINRA arbitrations) for four independent broker-dealers.
- Advised clients in connection with SEC and FINRA exams and inquiries.
- Represented a federal equity receiver pursuing claims against former officers, directors, and auditors associated with a Ponzi scheme.
Other Litigation
- Represented software company in a breach of contract dispute and recovered settlement on their behalf.
- Successfully defended medical technology company in product liability litigation relating to EMS supplies and surgical tools.
- Represented company shareholders in connection with dispute over dissolution of company. Prevailed on demurrer and having all claims against shareholders (including fraud) dismissed with prejudice. The dismissal resulted in favorable resolution of one remaining claim against a corporate entity.
- Second-chaired trial for declaratory relief involving assignment of a lease and prevailed motion for non-suit.
viewpoints
Telephone and Texting Compliance News — November 2024
November 27, 2024 | Article | By Russell Fox, Jonathan P. Garvin, Joshua Briones, Esteban Morales, Grecia A. Rivas
This month’s newsletter covers an FCC Report and Order authorizing many telecommunications service providers to use third parties to “sign” calls on their behalf consistent with STIR/SHAKEN’s technical requirements. It also discusses a California federal court’s summary judgment decision in Williams v. DDR Media, LLC, which sent a message that compliance tools that prioritize privacy and operate without substantive interpretation of communications are not wiretapping consumers under the California Invasion of Privacy Act.
Telephone and Texting Compliance News: Litigation Update — A Win for TCPA Compliance and the Lead Generation Industry
November 27, 2024 | Article | By Joshua Briones, Esteban Morales, Grecia A. Rivas
Read about a California federal court’s summary judgment decision in Williams v. DDR Media, LLC, which sent the message that that compliance tools that prioritize privacy and operate without substantive interpretation of communications are not wiretapping consumers under the California Invasion of Privacy Act.
Telephone and Texting Compliance News — October 2024
October 31, 2024 | Article | By Russell Fox, Jonathan P. Garvin, Joshua Briones, Esteban Morales, Nadia Zivkov
Read about FCC compliance rules concerning consumer requests to revoke consent for calls and texts under the TCPA, FCC Enforcement Bureau actions aimed at stopping the transmission of illegal robocall traffic over gateway provider Identidad Advertising Development LLC’s network, and a pending Supreme Court case that raises the issue of whether the Hobbs Act required a district court to accept the FCC’s interpretation of the TCPA as it pertains to faxes received by email.
Telephone and Texting Compliance News: Litigation Update — Will the Supreme Court Revive TCPA Fax Cases and Deliver Another Blow to the FCC?
October 30, 2024 | Article | By Joshua Briones, Esteban Morales, Nadia Zivkov
Read about McLaughlin Chiropractic Associates, Inc. v. McKesson Corporation, a pending Supreme Court case that raises the issue of whether the Hobbs Act required a district court to accept the FCC’s interpretation of the TCPA as it pertains to faxes received by email.
Telephone and Texting Compliance News: Litigation Update — Florida Federal Court Upholds Prior Express Invitation and Draws Distinction to Section 227(b)
September 30, 2024 | Article | By Joshua Briones, Esteban Morales, Grecia A. Rivas
Read about a Florida federal court’s dismissal of a TCPA class action involving a text message and multiple calls stemming from the plaintiff’s disclosure of her phone number during a store survey.
Telephone and Texting Compliance News — September 2024
September 30, 2024 | Article | By Russell Fox, Jonathan P. Garvin, Joshua Briones, Esteban Morales, Grecia A. Rivas
Read about an FCC Report and Order commissioners will vote on individually that encompasses two other pending orders related to call-blocking, text-message blocking, and making e-mail-to-text an opt-in service. This month’s newsletter also covers a Florida federal court’s dismissal of a TCPA class action involving a text message and multiple calls stemming from the plaintiff’s disclosure of her phone number during a store survey.
Telephone and Texting Compliance News: Litigation Update — Contract Language Brings Telemarketing TCPA Allegations to a Halt
August 27, 2024 | Article | By Joshua Briones, Esteban Morales
Read about a Texas federal court’s decision in Bradford v. Sovereign Pest Control, which provided valuable guidance on when a call or text message qualifies as telemarketing and requires heightened consent.
Telephone and Texting Compliance News — August 2024
August 27, 2024 | Article | By Russell Fox, Joshua Briones, Jonathan P. Garvin, Esteban Morales
Read about the FCC’s adoption of a Notice of Apparent Liability against voice service provider Lingo Telecom, its proposed rulemaking focused on AI-generated robocalls and robotexts, and its Notice of Inquiry seeking comment on protecting privacy in connection with calls made using AI technologies, plus a Texas federal court decision that provides guidance on when a call or text message qualifies as telemarketing and requires heightened consent.
District Court Denies Class Cert in TCPA Suit on Ascertainability Grounds
August 2, 2024 | Blog | By Joshua Briones, Esteban Morales, Nadia Zivkov
In a win for Defendant IQVIA, Inc., accused of allegedly sending faxes in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania denied Plaintiff Brian J. Lyngaas D.D.S.’s (Lyngaas) motion for class certification, agreeing with IQVIA that the class did not cross the Third Circuit’s threshold ascertainability requirement.
Telephone and Texting Compliance News: Litigation Update — TCPA Defense Post-Chevron: Insights from Cacho v. McCarthy & Kelly LLC
July 29, 2024 | Article | By Joshua Briones, Esteban Morales, Sofia Nuño
Read about a New York federal court’s decision in Cacho v. McCarthy & Kelly, which provides valuable insights into TCPA compliance and defense strategies post-Chevron.
News & Press
Mintz Member Esteban Morales Named 2024 “Lawyer on the Fast Track” by The Recorder
September 11, 2024
Mintz Member Esteban Morales was named a 2024 “Lawyer on the Fast Track” by The Recorder in its 2024 California Legal Awards. The award recognizes “the next generation of legal leaders under the age of 40.”
The Best Lawyers in America 2025 Recognizes 184 Mintz Attorneys across 56 Practice Areas
August 15, 2024
187 Mintz attorneys have been recognized by Best Lawyers® in the 2025 edition of The Best Lawyers in America©. Notably, three Mintz attorneys received 2025 “Lawyer of the Year” awards, and 64 firm attorneys were included in the 2025 edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch.
Seven Mintz attorneys were recognized in Benchmark Litigation’s 2024 “40 & Under List” which spotlights the “top emerging talent in litigation” who are 40 years old and under. The annual “40 & Under List” is compiled through peer and client review, as well as consideration of individual cases.
Mintz Member Esteban Morales has been recognized by Los Angeles Business Journal in its 2024 “Leaders of Influence: Litigators & Trial Attorneys” list which recognizes lawyers who “go to the proverbial mat to fight for their clients,” according to the publication.
Think Twice Before Hitting 'Send' After 9 at Night
January 4, 2024
The Daily Business Review recently published an article written by Member Esteban Morales addressing the growing trend of litigation under the Florida Consumer Collection Practices Act (FCCPA) concerning billing-related emails sent outside regular business hours.
Mintz Announces Record Member Growth in 2023
December 22, 2023
Mintz proudly announced the election of 13 attorneys to Members and the addition of a record-setting 22 new lateral Members in 2023, with 11 Partners in the newly opened Toronto office. This diverse group strengthens Mintz’s core areas, spanning Commercial and IP Litigation, Life Sciences, Tech, Private Equity, and Energy & Sustainability. The elevated Members and new lateral additions bring invaluable expertise to help clients navigate complex legal landscapes.
Mintz is pleased to announce that 120 firm attorneys have been recognized as leaders by Best Lawyers® in the 2024 edition of The Best Lawyers in America©.
Robotext Scam Bill Could Transform TCPA Landscape
September 16, 2022
Best Lawyers® recognized 108 firm attorneys in the 2023 edition of The Best Lawyers in America©. Notably, two Mintz attorneys – Poonam Patidar and Scott M. Stanton – received 2023 “Lawyer of the Year” awards, and 28 firm attorneys were included in the inaugural edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch.
2021 Trends in Bet-the-Company Class Actions
January 5, 2022
2020 Trends in Bet-the-Company Class Actions
January 6, 2021
Preparing for COVID-19 Biometric Litigation
July 16, 2020
Covid-19 and Class Actions
May 1, 2020
Citrix Telemarketing Row Stayed For High Court TCPA Ruling
April 24, 2020
The Latest On Article III Standing In False Ad Class Actions
December 14, 2018
An Opportunity To Slow The Rise Of Securities Class Actions
November 8, 2018
BART Derails App User's Data-Collection Class Action
December 15, 2017
The Drone Slayer and Private Property
June 2, 2017
An Update On Drone Privacy Concerns
October 5, 2016
Events & Speaking
LeadsCon 2024 – Reimagining Lead Gen: Legal Insights for Today’s Product Builders
Paris Hotel & Casino, Las Vegas
Mintz’s Annual Developing Trends in Bet-the-Company Class Actions 2021 Edition
Mintz Webinar
Los Angeles
West Coast Director Education Forum
American College of Corporate Directors
Renaissance Hotel at Los Angeles International Airport, Los Angeles, CA
Guide to Consumer Communications and Compliance: TCPA, FDCPA, CAN-SPAM, and CIPA
IAPP KnowledgeNet CLE
SDG&E Energy Innovation Center 4760 Clairemont Mesa Blvd. San Diego, CA
Publications
- Author, Think Twice Before Hitting 'Send' After 9 at Night, ALM Daily Business Review (January 2024)
Recognition & Awards
Best Lawyers of America Ones to Watch - Mass Tort Litigation / Class Actions - Defendants (2021-2025)
Best Lawyers in America "Ones to Watch": Litigation - Banking and Finance (2024-2025)
Southern California Super Lawyers Rising Star: Class Action (2018-2020)
Recipient of Public Counsel Law Center Children's Rights Project Award
Los Angeles Business Journal Leaders of Influence: Litigators & Trial Attorneys (2024)
Benchmark Litigation: 40 & Under Hot List (2024)