Insights Center
Thought leadership, news, events — you will find them all here, right at your fingertips. We’ve consolidated the firm’s most popular content in one, easy to search location. Enter a key word or phrase to find pertinent blog posts, articles, press releases, and upcoming events.
Mintz Viewpoints
Showing 8121 - 8128 of 11367 results
Fed. Cir. Defers to PTAB Finding of Obviousness in First Pharma IPR Reviews (Merck v. Gnosis)
December 21, 2015| Alert| Viewpoint
Congress Passes 2016 Spending Bill with Significant Funding for Food Agencies
December 19, 2015| Blog| Viewpoint
When The Government Comes Knocking In 2016
December 18, 2015| News
Law 360's Top Immigration Cases of 2015: SEC Enforcement in EB-5
December 18, 2015| Blog| Viewpoint
One Particular (Safe) Harbor: Safe Harbor for Massachusetts Earned Sick Time Law Ends on December 31, 2015.
December 18, 2015| Blog| Viewpoint
An Unrealistic Threat Of A Pay Cut To A High-Level Employee Is Not An Adverse Action, So Says The Fifth Circuit
December 18, 2015| Blog| Viewpoint
Spending and Tax Deal Brings ITC and PTC Extensions
December 17, 2015| Blog| Viewpoint
News & Press Releases
Mintz is pleased to announce that Member and Chair of the firm’s Intellectual Property Division Michael Renaud and Members Matthew Galica, Frank Gerratana, Marguerite McConihe, Michael Newman, Adam Rizk, and James Wodarski have been named to the 2024 IAM Strategy 300: The World’s Leading IP Strategists list.
The Best Lawyers in America 2025 Recognizes 187 Mintz Attorneys across 56 Practice Areas
August 15, 2024
187 Mintz attorneys have been recognized by Best Lawyers® in the 2025 edition of The Best Lawyers in America©. Notably, three Mintz attorneys received 2025 “Lawyer of the Year” awards, and 64 firm attorneys were included in the 2025 edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch.
Seven Mintz attorneys were recognized in Benchmark Litigation’s 2024 “40 & Under List” which spotlights the “top emerging talent in litigation” who are 40 years old and under. The annual “40 & Under List” is compiled through peer and client review, as well as consideration of individual cases.