Skip to main content

Nadia A. Zivkov

Associate

[email protected]

+1.310.586.3210

Share:

Nadia advises and represents clients in a broad spectrum of litigation matters in state and federal courts, including disputes involving complex commercial issues, securities, real estate, and antitrust claims. Her practice also encompasses arbitrations, advising clients in government enforcement actions, and handling insurance/reinsurance matters. Nadia works with public and private companies in a variety of sectors, with a particular focus on the consumer finance, pharmaceuticals, and oil industries. She also has ample experience in class action defense, particularly in areas such as consumer fraud, data privacy, data breach, biometric, marketing, technology, and compliance issues.

Prior to joining Mintz, Nadia was a commercial litigation associate at an international law firm. Earlier, while working as an associate at a national law firm, she served as a legal secondee in New York at one of the leading investment banks, where she provided advisory services as part of the wealth management corporate and litigation teams.

Nadia also maintains a significant pro bono practice, which has included representing plaintiffs in a civil rights class action defending the rights of incarcerated transgender individuals, and advising parents in child support and government benefits cases.

In addition to a JD, Nadia also holds a Wharton Certificate in Management from the Wharton School. During law school, Nadia interned with a software company that provides financial management and human resources products.

viewpoints

Read about FCC compliance rules concerning consumer requests to revoke consent for calls and texts under the TCPA, FCC Enforcement Bureau actions aimed at stopping the transmission of illegal robocall traffic over gateway provider Identidad Advertising Development LLC’s network, and a pending Supreme Court case that raises the issue of whether the Hobbs Act required a district court to accept the FCC’s interpretation of the TCPA as it pertains to faxes received by email. 

Read more

Read about McLaughlin Chiropractic Associates, Inc. v. McKesson Corporation, a pending Supreme Court case that raises the issue of whether the Hobbs Act required a district court to accept the FCC’s interpretation of the TCPA as it pertains to faxes received by email. 

Read more

In a win for Defendant IQVIA, Inc., accused of allegedly sending faxes in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania denied Plaintiff Brian J. Lyngaas D.D.S.’s (Lyngaas) motion for class certification, agreeing with IQVIA that the class did not cross the Third Circuit’s threshold ascertainability requirement.

Read more

Read about a North American Number Council meeting that will focus on possible new obligations for interconnected VoIP providers that obtain direct access to numbers and resellers of numbers, a Maryland federal court’s decision that a defendant in a TCPA case had not obtained prior express written consent via phone to make certain telemarketing calls, and a Fourth Circuit opinion on fax advertisements under the TCPA.

Read more

Read about a Maryland federal court’s decision that a defendant in a TCPA case had not obtained prior express written consent via phone to make certain telemarketing calls and a Fourth Circuit opinion providing further guidance on fax advertisements under the TCPA.

Read more
Read less

Publications

  • Author, "The Future of the Bar Exam: Should Remote Testing Continue To Be an Option?" New York Law Journal (June 2021)
Read less