Sebastian focuses his practice on complex civil litigation before state and federal courts. He counsels clients on case strategy and risks and advises on all stages of litigation. He works with clients across a variety of sectors, including real estate and education.
Prior to joining Mintz, Sebastian was an associate and a law clerk at a California-based law firm that serves the education sector. In those roles, he worked on litigation and appellate cases as well as governance, real estate, and employment matters.
Sebastian earned his JD with a concentration in Civil Litigation. During law school, he served as a judicial extern for two judges in the US District Court for the Southern District of California — the Honorable Andrew G. Schopler, a Magistrate Judge of the court, and the Honorable Cynthia A. Bashant. He also interned with the Civil Litigation Division of the San Diego City Attorney’s Office. In law school, Sebastian served as a research assistant for a constitutional law professor and a managing editor and associate editor of the San Diego International Law Journal. Additionally, he was a member of the USD School of Law Appellate Moot Court Board.
viewpoints
Can a Consumer Plausibly Allege Your Product Labeling is False or Misleading Under California Law?
December 12, 2024 | Blog | By Paige Adaskaveg, Daniel Herling, Arameh Zargham O'Boyle, Sebastian Navarro
The following decisions provide useful guidance for crafting product labeling that is resilient to legal challenges brought under California’s consumer protection laws.
ADA “Tester” Standing Case Evades US Supreme Court Review—For Now
December 26, 2023 | Blog | By Todd Rosenbaum, Sebastian Navarro
As the United States Supreme Court was on the cusp of resolving a circuit split concerning the propriety of “tester” standing under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), the Respondent, a self-avowed ADA tester who was responsible for creating the circuit split by filing lawsuits in numerous jurisdictions—voluntarily dismissed the case on appeal from the U.S. District Court for the District of Maine.
U.S. Supreme Court Grants Cert in ADA “Tester” Case
May 3, 2023 | Blog | By Todd Rosenbaum, Adam B. Korn, Sebastian Navarro
In late March, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari involving a case that could have a nationwide impact on lawsuits brought under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”).
An Overview of Why Class Action Privacy Lawsuits May Have Just Gotten Bigger – Yet Again.
March 1, 2023 | Blog | By Adam B. Korn, Sebastian Navarro, Todd Rosenbaum
Lensa: Are AI Art Generators Copyright Infringers?
February 15, 2023 | Blog | By Frank Gerratana, Michael Graif, Sebastian Navarro
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is now at our fingertips. No longer a concept hidden behind the walls of Big Tech and academia, AI programs are now available and accessible to everyone. Generative AI tools like ChatGPT have made headlines for its human-like conversation and writing, and Lensa has done the same for its ability to create original works of art.
Google Pays Record Privacy Settlement as Lawsuits are Expected to Rise
November 22, 2022 | Blog | By Adam B. Korn, Sebastian Navarro, Todd Rosenbaum
In what is considered the largest privacy-related settlement in history, Google will pay $391.5 million to 40 states to settle an investigation by 40 state attorneys general. The bipartisan coalition of attorneys general alleged that Google misled users into believing that opting out of sharing their location data prevented the company from tracking users’ locations.
News & Press
Member Todd Rosenbaum and Associates Adam Korn and Sebastian Navarro co-authored an article that was republished by Class Action Reporter. The article discusses rulings in Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) lawsuits.
Google LLC Agrees To Settle Privacy Class Action For $391.5M
January 6, 2023
Member Todd Rosenbaum and Associates Adam Korn and Sebastian Navarro co-authored an article that was republished by Class Action Reporter. The article analyzes Google paying $391.5 million to settle an investigation by 40 state attorneys general.