Mintz Ranked Among Most Active and Best Performing ITC Firms by Patexia
Mintz has once again been recognized as one of the most active and high-performing International Trade Commission (ITC) law firms in the Patexia 2025 ITC Intelligence Report.
The report, which provides a comprehensive overview of the best performing and most active ITC Section 337 attorneys and law firms, also named several of Mintz’s intellectual property practitioners among the most active and best performing in the country.
Patexia's ITC Intelligence Report covers the period between January 1, 2019, and December 31, 2024, encompassing a total of 406 investigations.
The annual report listed Mintz as the No. 7 most active law firm representing complainants, along with top 50 recognitions as a best performing and most active law firm overall and best performing law firm representing complainants.
Michael Renaud, Chair of Mintz’s Intellectual Property Practice, received high rankings as one of the most active and best performing ITC attorneys overall as well as best performing and most active ITC attorneys representing complainants. Members Samuel Davenport, Matthew Karambelas, Marguerite McConihe, Michael McNamara, William Meunier, Adam Rizk, Timothy Rousseau, James Wodarski, Catherine Xu, Special Counsel Sharon O'Brien, and Associates Adam Banes, Hannah Edge, Nana Liu, Tianyi Tan, and James Thomson ranked among the 100 most active or best performing attorneys representing complainants.
Mintz’s Intellectual Property Practice boasts an accomplished team of patent litigators with the knowledge of and experience with the ITC staff attorneys and Administrative Law Judges who are critical to success. Mintz is one of a select few firms ever to have achieved a General Exclusion Order in a 337 investigation, and the team has successfully represented parties on both sides of ITC cases. Learn more about Mintz’s ITC Practice here.
Founded in 2010, Patexia Inc. is an intellectual property community and information service. The 2025 ITC Intelligence Report is based on data obtained from public sources, including the ITC’s Electronic Document Information System, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board, and PACER (Public Access to Court Electronic Records), as well as self-reported by attorneys on the Patexia website.