Skip to main content

Telephone and Texting Compliance News — January 2025

We are pleased to present our latest edition of Telephone and Texting Compliance News, providing insights and news related to the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). In this month’s Regulatory Update, we discuss the potential implications to the FCC of President Trump’s recent executive order directing all executive departments and agencies to pause currently pending proceedings and review any proposed or adopted rules not yet in effect. Although it is an independent agency, the FCC has voluntarily followed similar executive orders and presidential memoranda in the past. We also review three TCPA- and TRACED Act-related actions that appear to fall within the scope of the executive order, including orders pertaining to third-party call authentication, Robocall Mitigation Database certification procedures for providers, and consumer revocation of consent to receive calls or texts.

In this month’s Litigation Update, we cover the Eleventh Circuit’s decision in Insurance Marketing Coalition v. FCC, which vacated the FCC’s one-to-one consent rule just one business day before it was set to go into effect. The court held that the agency exceeded its statutory authority by interpreting “prior express consent” under the TCPA to require separate consent for each seller and for calls or texts to be “logically and topically associated” with the interaction that prompted the consumer’s consent. Although it is unclear how, if at all, the FCC will respond to this development under the new administration, businesses can rely on pre-one-to-one consent standards when obtaining prior express written consent from consumers.

If you have suggestions for topics you’d like us to feature in this newsletter, or any questions about the content in this issue, please feel free to reach out to an attorney on Mintz’s TCPA and Consumer Calling Practice team.

In This Edition

Regulatory Update

Litigation Update

 

 

Subscribe To Viewpoints

Authors

Russell H. Fox is a wireless communications attorney at Mintz. He guides clients through federal legislative, regulatory, and transactional matters. Russell also participates in FCC proceedings, negotiates spectrum agreements, and represents clients in spectrum auctions.
Jonathan Garvin is an attorney at Mintz who focuses on legal challenges facing companies in the communications and media industries. He advises clients on transactional, regulatory, and compliance issues before the FCC involving wireless, broadband, broadcast, and cable matters.
Joshua Briones

Joshua Briones

Member / Managing Member, Los Angeles Office

Joshua Briones is a commercial litigator who defends consumer class actions for Mintz. He's represented clients in a wide range of industries, including financial services, life sciences, manufacturing, and retail, in cases involving false advertising, unfair trade practices, and other claims.
Esteban Morales is a Mintz litigator who handles class action defense and financial services litigation for companies of all sizes. He defends clients targeted in class action suits, and the results include dismissals at the pleading stage. Esteban practices in Mintz's Sports Law Practice.
Grecia A. Rivas-Rudra is an Associate at Mintz who focuses her practice on complex commercial litigation, with an emphasis on disputes involving public and private construction, and government contracting matters. She has experience with litigation, bid protests, and compliance and enforcement matters relating to construction projects.