Susan Berson and Brent Henry Recognized as Health Care Trailblazers by the National Law Journal
Filter by:
Mintz Pro Bono Committee Chair Susan Finegan to Receive Boston Bar Association’s Thurgood Marshall Award
October 03, 2024
Mintz Pro Bono Committee Chair and litigation member Susan Finegan will receive the Boston Bar Association’s (BBA) Thurgood Marshall Award at its annual meeting on November 14. The award “honors Boston attorneys in the private bar whose extraordinary work has enhanced the human dignity of others.”
Mintz IP Group Named “Litigation Department of the Year” in 2024 New England Legal Awards
October 02, 2024
Mintz’s intellectual property litigation group was named “Litigation Department of the Year” for the IP specialty category in the 2024 New England Legal Awards. The awards recognize attorneys and firms in Connecticut, Maine, Vermont, New Hampshire, Massachusetts, and Rhode Island.
SEC Sends a Message to Startups About ‘Fake It’ Culture
October 2, 2024
International Practice Co-chair Larry Naughton was quoted by The Wall Street Journal in an article about recent enforcement actions by the SEC in connection with startups misleading and defrauding investors.
Mintz is pleased to announce that 31 attorneys have been named Massachusetts Super Lawyers and 35 attorneys have been named Massachusetts Rising Stars for 2024.
Defending AI, Machine Learning Patents In Life Sciences
October 1, 2024
Intellectual Property Chair Michael Renaud and Associates Meena Seralathan, Simone Yhap, and Williams Dixon recently wrote an article for Law360 focused on protecting artificial intelligence and machine learning patents in the life sciences industry following the US Supreme Court’s 2014 decision in Alice v. CLS Bank.
Lenovo’s Setback in Ericsson ITC Case May Impact Other SEP Disputes
September 26, 2024
Intellectual Property Division Chair Michael Renaud was quoted by IAM in an article about the ITC case between Ericsson and Lenovo and its potential implications for FRAND negotiations. While most ITC cases involving Standard Essential Patents (SEPs) have resulted in no violation findings, this case could change that.