Susan Berson and Brent Henry Recognized as Health Care Trailblazers by the National Law Journal
Filter by:
Has Trump Been Good for Big Law?
November 7, 2017
This feature article looks at the impact of the Trump administration on the practice of law. Susan Cohen, founder and Chair of the Immigration Practice at Mintz, is quoted within the piece. Susan’s comments focus on immigration efforts under Trump.
BigLaw Directs Pro Bono Efforts At Trump Admin Policies
November 6, 2017
Susan Cohen, Chair of the Immigration practice, and Sue Finegan, a litigator and Chair of Mintz’s Pro Bono Committee, were quoted in a Law360 article covering the efforts by law who may be taking on more pro bono matters as a result of actions by the Trump administration.
Off the Pedestal
November 6, 2017
Washington, D.C. Member Chuck Samuels was quoted in an Inside HigherEd article on the impact that the proposed Republican tax plan would have on higher education – specifically touching upon potentially cutting off key sources of borrowing and imposing new taxes on wealthy institutions.
Muni market blindsided by bond provisions in House GOP tax plan
November 2, 2017
Member Chuck Samuels, a government law and federal and international regulatory attorney, is quoted in this The Bond Buyer article discussing the reaction to the House Republicans’ tax bill, which would eliminate private activity bonds and advance refunding bonds after this 2017.
How Mass. Can Prepare For Cannabis Industry Energy Use
November 2, 2017
ML Strategies’ Julie Cox, David O’Connor and Caitlin Beresin collaborated on a Law360 column discussing the impact of the cannabis industry, specifically as it pertains to the legalization of the recreational use of marijuana and the growing awareness of the environmental impacts it has.
A Measure Of Justice For Privacy and Security Issues
November 1, 2017
Mintz Associate Mo Tashakor authored an article published by Georgetown Law Technology examining the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ)’s October 2017 guidelines to its attorneys and agents narrowing their ability to impose gag orders on tech companies, which aimed to provide transparency and confidence around DOJ requests for access to customer data stored on tech company servers.