Skip to main content

Abdie Santiago

Associate

[email protected]

+1.202.434.7321

Share:

Abdie represents life sciences and health care companies in a broad spectrum of regulatory, fraud and abuse, and transactional matters. He has experience advising clients on government drug pricing requirements, proposed federal and state drug pricing laws, and Medicare and Medicaid coverage requirements. He also regularly handles due diligence and licensure analyses for health care practice transactions and assists clients with Anti-Kickback Statute and False Claims Act investigations brought by the government.

Prior to joining Mintz, Abdie was an associate at a multinational law firm, where he handled regulatory and transactional matters for health care and pharmaceutical clients.

Abdie also maintains an active pro-bono practice, which has included working on legal issues involving compensation for veterans and immigration.

While earning his JD, Abdie served as a senior editor for the Stanford Law & Policy Review and as co-president of the Stanford Latinx Law Students Association. He also participated in the Youth and Education Law Project for the Mills Legal Clinic. In addition, he served as a government affairs intern for the Office of the Governor of Puerto Rico at the Puerto Rico Federal Affairs Administration. In that role, he conducted research on legislation, including in connection with the government of Puerto Rico’s pursuit of expanded federal health care programs for the territory.

viewpoints

Read about the impact of changes to Medicare Part D’s Part D benefit redesign and other changes that went into effect on January 1, 2025, and additional changes to watch for in 2025.

Read more

This article discusses challenges related to laws prohibiting manufacturers from paying rebates on drugs dispensed to 340B eligible patients, known as nonduplication, how nonduplication is linked to implementation of the Maximum Fair Price, and stakeholder concerns with successfully navigating these new requirements.

Read more

Mintz’s Pharmacy Benefits and PBM Contracting Practice is pleased to present the ‘Fourth Edition: Q1 2025’ of our Mintz IRA Update, a regular publication that delves into developments of the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (IRA) and their impact on pharmaceutical supply chain stakeholders.

Read more

The PBM Policy and Legislative Update — Winter 2025 edition builds upon prior PBM Policy and Legislative Updates and summarizes activity from October through December (2024) that affects the PBM industry. It highlights (i) federal activities, (ii) state activities, and (iii) other noteworthy events and trends affecting the PBM industry.

Read more

Host Of Counsel Bridgette Keller invites the Mintz Health Law team to reflect on what they’re grateful for as they prepare for the year ahead. Hear from a dynamic group of Members, Of Counsel, and Associates as they share their perspectives on what’s coming up over the horizon.

Read more

Building upon prior issues and summarizing activity from July through September, the Fall 2024 PBM Update highlights federal legislative activity and oversight, state legislative activity and oversight, and other noteworthy events and trends affecting the PBM industry.

Read more

On November 12, 2024, the drug manufacturer Johnson & Johnson (J&J) filed a lawsuit against the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. The lawsuit relates to J&J’s proposal to require certain 340B covered entities – specifically, disproportionate share hospitals (DSH) – that purchase J&J’s drugs Stelara and Xarelto under the 340B Drug Pricing Program to do so under a rebate model. J&J is challenging HRSA’s threatened enforcement action against the drug maker.

Read more

On September 26, 2024, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) released a final rule implementing changes to the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program (MDRP). While not the focus of the agency’s rulemaking, stakeholders used the opportunity to comment on the proposed rule to air concerns and grievances related to the 340B Drug Pricing Program (340B Program). Although CMS acknowledged the flood of 340B Program comments, the agency ultimately punted on responding to stakeholders because the comments were outside the scope of the rulemaking. The response from CMS is understandable, but the numerous comments from stakeholders add to the growing calls for additional guidance and improvements to the 340B Program.

Read more

As we enter into the final months of 2024, new developments in the administration of the 340B Drug Pricing Program signal that additional reform may be on the way. Although recent revisions to the 340B program’s administrative dispute resolution (ADR) process represented a positive development in program reform, many questions remain as to how the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) along with Congress may resolve stakeholder concerns with the drug pricing program’s future.

Read more
Read less