Skip to main content

Abdie Santiago

Associate

[email protected]

+1.202.434.7321

Share:

Abdie represents life sciences and health care companies in a broad spectrum of regulatory, fraud and abuse, and transactional matters. He has experience advising clients on government drug pricing requirements, proposed federal and state drug pricing laws, and Medicare and Medicaid coverage requirements. He also regularly handles due diligence and licensure analyses for health care practice transactions and assists clients with Anti-Kickback Statute and False Claims Act investigations brought by the government.

Prior to joining Mintz, Abdie was an associate at a multinational law firm, where he handled regulatory and transactional matters for health care and pharmaceutical clients.

Abdie also maintains an active pro-bono practice, which has included working on legal issues involving compensation for veterans and immigration.

While earning his JD, Abdie served as a senior editor for the Stanford Law & Policy Review and as co-president of the Stanford Latinx Law Students Association. He also participated in the Youth and Education Law Project for the Mills Legal Clinic. In addition, he served as a government affairs intern for the Office of the Governor of Puerto Rico at the Puerto Rico Federal Affairs Administration. In that role, he conducted research on legislation, including in connection with the government of Puerto Rico’s pursuit of expanded federal health care programs for the territory.

viewpoints

Read about how the removal of the average manufacturer price (AMP) cap on Medicaid rebates prompted manufacturers to cut insulin prices to avoid significant payments to Medicaid.

Read more

Read about the small biotech exception exempting certain drugs from the  Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program for the years 2026, 2027, and 2028.

Read more

A Virginia Federal Judge recently rejected a challenge to a negative Advisory Opinion issued by the Department of Health & Human Services’ Office of Inspector General (OIG) that disapproved of a proposal where certain pharmaceutical manufacturers would fund financial assistance for the manufacturers’ Part D oncology drugs. The Advisory Opinion was requested by the Pharmaceutical Coalition for Patient Access (PCPA), which is a charitable organization formed and fully funded by pharmaceutical manufacturers of oncology drugs. Subsequently, PCPA brought the lawsuit alleging that the negative Advisory Opinion violated the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). 

Read more
Read less