T. Scott Thompson
Member / Chair, Communications Infrastructure Litigation Practice
+ 1.202.434.7440
Scott serves as Chair of the firm’s Communications Infrastructure Litigation Practice and represents companies and industry associations in a broad range of legal, regulatory, and policy matters involving the deployment of wireless and wireline telecommunications networks. He leverages more than three decades of experience and his in-depth knowledge of the industry to help clients develop strategies for nationwide deployments and resolve high-stakes disputes.
Along with serving as lead counsel in numerous appeals that set precedent on key Communications Act issues, Scott has prevailed in dozens of trial court cases that challenged local government denials of permits and prohibitions of service. His role as a trusted advisor to industry leaders includes representing telecommunications providers and organizations in major policy-setting proceedings before the Federal Communications Commission. He is also frequently asked to speak on legal and policy issues that impact the telecommunications sector.
Prior to joining Mintz, Scott was a partner in the Washington, DC office of a national law firm, where he guided telecommunications clients through complex legal and regulatory matters. Earlier, he served as a partner and an associate at a Washington, DC-based law firm focused on communications law.
In law school, Scott served as notes editor of the George Washington Journal of International Law and Economics.
Scott serves as Chair of the firm’s Communications Infrastructure Litigation Practice and represents companies and industry associations in a broad range of legal, regulatory, and policy matters involving the deployment of wireless and wireline telecommunications networks. He leverages more than three decades of experience and his in-depth knowledge of the industry to help clients develop strategies for nationwide deployments and resolve high-stakes disputes.
Experience
- Lead counsel in multiple precedent-setting appellate cases on significant Communications Act issues, including the T-Mobile South LLC v. City of Roswell US Supreme Court case.
- Successfully represented wireless carriers and tower companies in dozens of lawsuits that challenged local government denials of permits and prohibitions of service under Sections 253 and 332 of the Communications Act.
- Represent providers and industry associations before the Federal Communications Commission, including in proceedings that led to a clarification of Communications Act provisions governing broadband facilities deployment.
- Advises multiple wireless industry participants in developing facilities deployment strategies under the Middle Class Taxpayer Relief and Jobs Creation Act of 2012, also called the "collocation by right" statute.
- Representing a national wireless carrier before local governments on wireless facility siting matters.
- Serving as lead counsel for a distributed antenna system (DAS) operator in federal and state court cases that challenge local regulation of wireless deployment in public rights of way. Helping DAS providers obtain state regulatory authority certificates in more than 30 states.
- Obtained reversal of an Eleventh Circuit decision that had upheld a municipality’s denial of an application to install a wireless facility.
- Served as lead counsel for a real estate investment trust in federal district court and the Second Circuit, prevailing in a challenge to a town’s denial of the REIT’s application to install a Distributed Antenna System in public rights of way.
- Served as counsel for three wireless industry companies in a challenge to a city ordinance that imposed a complex permitting process on wireless installations in public rights of way. Co-chaired the three-week bench trial that led to a court ruling that the city’s rules violated the federal collocation by right statute and California law regarding wireless permit terms.
- Served as lead counsel for a wireless carrier before Sixth Circuit in a successful challenge to local government denial of wireless tower application. The case of first impression established the standard for "effective prohibition" claims under 47 U.S.C. § 332(c)(7)(B)(i)(II) and positively clarified standard for "substantial evidence" claims under Section 332(c)(7)(B)(iii).
- Served as lead counsel for a major mobile communications company before the Fourth Circuit in a successful challenge to a municipality’s denial of its application for wireless tower.
- Submitted comments in rulemaking for a distributed antenna system (DAS) provider regarding FCC policies and rules governing utility pole attachment rates, and terms and conditions, leading to landmark 2011 FCC order regarding pole attachment rules.
- Successfully defended a case that challenged the City of New York's grant of a franchise to a DAS provider.
- Represented a DAS provider in a complaint against a telecommunications provider for denial of access to underground conduits in Massachusetts.
- Filed an amicus curiae brief on behalf of a DAS provider and The DAS Forum in support of petition for certiorari to the US Supreme Court and during a Ninth Circuit rehearing en banc concerning Section 253 of the Communications Act’s application to county wireless zoning requirements.
- Served as lead counsel for a national wireless carrier in precedent-setting wireless siting litigation before the Ninth Circuit and in district court. Obtained a district court order that found the city’s denial of the client's wireless siting application violated Section 332(c)(7) of the federal Communications Act, which the Ninth Circuit affirmed.
- Represented a telecommunications provider in a successful DC Circuit appeal of an FCC decision imposing back-up power requirements on telephone company and wireless facilities.
- Served as lead counsel for a DAS provider in a federal court challenge to a City of New York franchise and regulation of wireless deployment in public rights of way. Obtained a Second Circuit reversal of the district court’s grant of summary judgment on our client’s claims that the city's franchise requirements violate Section 253 of the federal Communications Act. The matter is pending on remand to the district court.
- Represented a competitive carrier in opposition to a deregulation request by a multinational telecommunications provider.
- Secured a preliminary injunction order prohibiting a defendant county from enforcing its wireless zoning code against a DAS provider on the grounds that Section 253 of the Federal Communications Act preempts the code.
- Obtained an order granting a plaintiff's request for summary judgment, establishing that AT&T video programming service is cable service and that AT&T is a “cable operator” subject to franchising requirements applicable under the Federal Cable Act. (Vacated as moot after new legislation applied new franchise requirements to AT&T.)
- Obtained a judgment and permanent injunction for a DAS provider, which preempts the defendant city's requirements for deployment of wireless facilities in public rights-of-way pursuant to Section 253 of Federal Communications Act.
- Successfully defended a Supreme Court of Pennsylvania case that challenged the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission's exemption from regulation of a DAS provider.
viewpoints
What's New in 5G - March 2022
March 3, 2022 | | By T. Scott Thompson, Angela Kung, Christen B'anca Glenn
What’s New in 5G - October 2021
October 6, 2021 | Blog | By Russell Fox, T. Scott Thompson, Angela Kung, Daniel P. Reing, Christen B'anca Glenn
What’s New in 5G - September 2021
September 1, 2021 | Blog | By Russell Fox, T. Scott Thompson, Angela Kung, Daniel P. Reing, Christen B'anca Glenn
What’s New in 5G - August 2021
August 3, 2021 | Blog | By Russell Fox, T. Scott Thompson, Angela Kung, Daniel P. Reing, Christen B'anca Glenn
What’s New in 5G - July 2021
July 1, 2021 | Blog | By Russell Fox, T. Scott Thompson, Angela Kung, Daniel P. Reing, Christen B'anca Glenn
What's New in 5G - June 2021
June 2, 2021 | Blog | By Russell Fox, T. Scott Thompson, Angela Kung, Daniel P. Reing, Christen B'anca Glenn
What's New in 5G - May 2021
May 3, 2021 | Blog | By Russell Fox, T. Scott Thompson, Angela Kung, Daniel P. Reing, Christen B'anca Glenn
What's New in 5G - April 2021
April 2, 2021 | Blog | By Russell Fox, T. Scott Thompson, Angela Kung, Daniel P. Reing, Christen B'anca Glenn
What's New in 5G - March 2021
March 2, 2021 | Blog | By Russell Fox, T. Scott Thompson, Angela Kung, Daniel P. Reing, Christen B'anca Glenn
What's New in 5G - February 2021
February 2, 2021 | Blog | By Russell Fox, T. Scott Thompson, Angela Kung, Daniel P. Reing, Christen B'anca Glenn
News & Press
Mintz Secures Summary Judgment for Client Horizon Tower
October 15, 2024
A team of Mintz attorneys won a motion for summary judgment for client Horizon Tower in its case against Park County, Wyoming.
The Best Lawyers in America 2025 Recognizes 184 Mintz Attorneys across 56 Practice Areas
August 15, 2024
187 Mintz attorneys have been recognized by Best Lawyers® in the 2025 edition of The Best Lawyers in America©. Notably, three Mintz attorneys received 2025 “Lawyer of the Year” awards, and 64 firm attorneys were included in the 2025 edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch.
Mintz Secures Defense Win for Horizon Tower
June 27, 2024
Law360's 2023 Telecommunications Editorial Advisory Board
August 22, 2023
Chair of the Communications Infrastructure Litigation Practice, Scott Thompson was selected to participate in Law360’s 2023 Telecommunications Editorial Advisory Board, which is a designated group of attorneys that provide feedback on the publication’s telecommunications news coverage and insights on how best to shape future coverage.
Mintz is pleased to announce that 120 firm attorneys have been recognized as leaders by Best Lawyers® in the 2024 edition of The Best Lawyers in America©.
BOSTON – Mintz has earned top rankings in the 2023 edition of Legal 500 United States guide. The firm is recognized in 14 practice categories, and 59 individual attorneys are also recognized in the guide, some in more than one category.
Best Lawyers® recognized 108 firm attorneys in the 2023 edition of The Best Lawyers in America©. Notably, two Mintz attorneys – Poonam Patidar and Scott M. Stanton – received 2023 “Lawyer of the Year” awards, and 28 firm attorneys were included in the inaugural edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch.
Meet Scott Thompson: Battling for the Wireless Infrastructure Industry in Cities and in Courts
July 22, 2021
Mintz Welcomes 21 Lateral Members in 2020
December 29, 2020
Events & Speaking
Connect (X) 2023: Where Infrastructure Meets Everything
Morial Convention Center New Orleans, LA
Scott serves as Chair of the firm’s Communications Infrastructure Litigation Practice and represents companies and industry associations in a broad range of legal, regulatory, and policy matters involving the deployment of wireless and wireline telecommunications networks. He leverages more than three decades of experience and his in-depth knowledge of the industry to help clients develop strategies for nationwide deployments and resolve high-stakes disputes.
Recognition & Awards
Recommended by the Legal 500 United States for Telecom & Broadcast: Regulatory (2022-2024)
Best Lawyers in America: Communications Law (2022-2025)
International Law Office and Lexology: “Client Choice Award” (2012–2013)
Scott serves as Chair of the firm’s Communications Infrastructure Litigation Practice and represents companies and industry associations in a broad range of legal, regulatory, and policy matters involving the deployment of wireless and wireline telecommunications networks. He leverages more than three decades of experience and his in-depth knowledge of the industry to help clients develop strategies for nationwide deployments and resolve high-stakes disputes.
Involvement
- Advisory Board, Telecom Land Management Law Report and Communications Environmental and Land Use Law Report, Pike & Fischer Inc.
- Member, Forum on Communications Law, American Bar Association
- Member, Federal Communications Bar Association
- Advocacy Committee, HetNet Forum, Wireless Infrastructure Association (2007–present)
- Advisory Board, Law360's 2023 Telecommunications Editorial
Recent Insights
A team of Mintz attorneys won a motion for summary judgment for client Horizon Tower in its case against Park County, Wyoming.
What’s New in Wireless - October 2024
October 2, 2024| Blog|
A New Age of Agency Rulemaking and Enforcement
September 18, 2024| Blog|
