Skip to main content

Mathilda S. McGee-Tubb

Member

[email protected]

+1.617.348.4404

Follow:
Share:

Mathilda is a multifaceted litigator who solves clients’ business disputes and personal challenges through creative solutions driven by each client’s particular priorities. She is equally comfortable as an advocate in the courtroom and the boardroom.

Mathilda’s practice encompasses complex commercial litigation, class actions, white-collar criminal and administrative investigations, trust and estate litigation, appellate litigation, and insurance coverage disputes. She has repeatedly obtained favorable pre-trial resolutions and won cases on motions to dismiss, at summary judgment, and following trial. Mathilda’s appellate experience uniquely positions her to help clients anticipate and navigate potential appellate issues as well.

In her Complex Commercial Litigation practice, Mathilda handles business disputes for companies and non-profits in the higher education, entertainment, pharmaceuticals, retail & consumer brands and real estate industries, among others. Mathilda’s expertise includes contract disputes, trade secrets cases, joint venture and partnership disputes, and business tort claims. In addition, Mathilda regularly and successfully defends against class action claims arising under state consumer protection laws, particularly those brought against landlords and property managers by residential tenants, and is one of a handful of class action defense lawyers in Massachusetts with in-depth knowledge of the Massachusetts security deposit and submetering laws.  

Mathilda also routinely serves as a trusted advisor to high-net-worth individuals. As a member of the firm’s White-Collar Criminal Defense Group, Mathilda has expertise representing high-profile individuals in all manner of investigations, with a particular focus on fraud investigations and charges levied by the Department of Justice and private institutions.  She also counsels private clients in various probate-related disputes including trustee removal actions, executor and administrator fiduciary duty claims, and a range of will and trust disputes.

Mathilda has a particular passion for legal issues facing the higher education industry. For clients in this sector, Mathilda draws on her broad experience as a lead team member in the defense of the “Varsity Blues” college admissions cases, an advisor to companies operating in the education space, and directly in the industry, including as a former legal intern at the United States Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights, an Education Pioneers Fellow, and an administrator at Columbia University. Mathilda has leveraged this experience to advise clients on compliance with federal education laws such as the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) and aid clients in navigating Title IX investigations on campus, among other representations.

Mathilda also has an active pro bono practice, with a particular focus on immigration and education equity issues. 

Prior to joining the firm, Mathilda served as a judicial law clerk to the Honorable Robert J. Cordy of the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court and to the Honorable Douglas P. Woodlock of the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts. During law school, Mathilda was editor-in-chief of the Boston College Law Review and a student attorney in the Boston College Legal Assistance Bureau.

Mathilda is a multifaceted litigator who solves clients’ business disputes and personal challenges through creative solutions driven by each client’s particular priorities. She is equally comfortable as an advocate in the courtroom and the boardroom.

Mathilda’s practice encompasses complex commercial litigation, class actions, white-collar criminal and administrative investigations, trust and estate litigation, appellate litigation, and insurance coverage disputes. She has repeatedly obtained favorable pre-trial resolutions and won cases on motions to dismiss, at summary judgment, and following trial. Mathilda’s appellate experience uniquely positions her to help clients anticipate and navigate potential appellate issues as well.

Experience

Commercial Litigation

  • Representing one of the largest generic drug manufacturers in two breach of contract cases.
  • Secured summary judgment and leveraged successful settlement for joint venture fund client in a dispute over ownership rights associated with an $80 million+ hotel property.
  • Prevailed at trial on behalf of a major interactive entertainment company against a claim brought by a player who was banned for cheating.
  • Obtained dismissal of a complex counterclaim asserting violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”) in federal district court.
  • Served as second chair at a trial representing a limited liability company in complex commercial litigation in the Delaware Court of Chancery relating to claims concerning contractual interpretation and fiduciary duties.
  • Obtained a favorable arbitration award in California in a dispute over an oral joint venture to open and operate a garment manufacturing facility in China.
  • Part of a team that obtained complete dismissal of a breach of contract and antitrust complaint in federal district court.

Class Action Defense

  • Defeated a motion for class certification and obtained summary judgment on claims brought by a putative class of tenants of a residential realty company asserting violations of the Massachusetts utility submetering laws and the Massachusetts consumer protection act, chapter 93A.
  • Obtained voluntary dismissal of a consumer class action involving unsolicited text messages under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA).

White Collar Criminal Defense

  • Part of a team that achieved the only acquittal of a parent, Amin C. Khoury, in the “Varsity Blues” college admissions cases. Mr. Khoury was found not guilty of all charges following a jury trial.
  • Part of a team that resolved a second case on behalf of a charged parent in the Varsity Blues cases.
  • Helped to secure dismissal on behalf of a former Saudi intelligence official in a case brought by the kingdom’s sovereign wealth fund and its subsidiaries, alleging our client embezzled billions of dollars.

Trust and Estate Litigation

  • Representing a prominent individual in his capacity as trustee of a multi-million dollar family trust in a dispute in Massachusetts Probate Court regarding the interpretation of core trust terms.
  • Represented a high-net-worth individual as a beneficiary of a $1b estate in a dispute in Massachusetts Probate Court regarding the proper distribution of assets.

Appellate

  • Representing a residential realty trust in a landlord-tenant class action before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit.
  • Representing a high-profile former Saudi official in a complex dispute before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit.
  • Representing intervenors in Boston Parent Coalition for Academic Excellence Corp. v. The School Committee of the City of Boston before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit.
  • Representing a trustee in a trustee removal action currently pending before the Massachusetts Appeals Court.
  • Represented a residential realty company in an appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit and in the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court on a certified question from the First Circuit.
  • Represented amici in several cases before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit and the United States Supreme Court, including:
    • President and Fellows of Harvard College, et al. v. United States Department of Homeland Security, et al., Case No. 1:20-cv-11283 (D. Mass.), a case challenging interim guidance issued by DHS and ICE during the COVID-19 pandemic that would have prevented international students on F-1 visas from taking online courses while enrolled in a United States academic program.
    • Department of Commerce, et al. v. New York, et al., No. 18-966 (U.S. Sup. Ct.), a case challenging the inclusion of a citizenship question on the decennial census questionnaire.
    • Abigail Noel Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin, et al., No. 14-981 (U.S. Sup. Ct.), a seminal case involving the issue of affirmative action in higher education.
Read less

viewpoints

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Upholds Trustee’s Adjustment from Principal to Income

November 26, 2024 | Blog | By Mathilda McGee-Tubb, Quinn Hetrick

How can a trustee balance the interests of various beneficiaries while also faithfully discharging their responsibilities under the terms of the trust and governing law? The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court recently offered guidance on a specific power granted to trustees: the power to reclassify trust assets between principal and income.  The SJC’s decision should give trustees comfort in their authority to make discretionary decisions, but it also articulates important considerations when doing so to ensure trustees remain and appear impartial.
Read more

In light of the McLoughlin decision and the Court’s seeming commitment to interpreting in terrorem clauses narrowly, estate planners and testators alike should keep the following considerations in mind when including in terrorem clauses in estate plans.

Read more

Arbitration Clauses and Class Action Waivers in Residential Leases: Are They Enforceable?

September 4, 2024 | Blog | By Mathilda McGee-Tubb, Janki Viroja

Landlords and property managers are increasingly adding arbitration clauses with class action waivers to their residential leases. These lease provisions can protect landlords from the significant time and costs associated with litigating claims brought by residents, including potential class claims that present high exposure risk for multifamily owners and managers. But the enforceability of these types of provisions remains an open question in many states. 

Read more
As discussed in an earlier post, colleges and universities are facing a wave of class action lawsuits seeking refunds of tuition, fees, and room and board expenses after schools closed their campus in the spring of 2020 in response to COVID-19.
Read more
Across the United States, students have brought over 100 class action lawsuits against public and private colleges and universities seeking refunds of tuition, fees, and room and board expenses after schools closed their physical facilities, including their classrooms and residence halls, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Read more
On Monday, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court issued a precedential decision in Nguyen v. Massachusetts Institute of Technology et al. (SJC-12329), which addresses the complicated issue of higher education institutions’ responsibility to protect students at risk of suicide.
Read more
In July 2016, four players on the Minnesota Lynx WNBA team wore black shirts in support of the Black Lives Matter social justice movement. The WNBA fined the players, but later rescinded the fines.
Read more
On June 23, 2016, in its second time hearing Fisher v. University of Texas, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the affirmative action admissions program at the University of Texas at Austin. The Court held that the program is lawful under the Equal Protection Clause because it is narrowly tailored to achieving concrete, compelling goals tied to the educational benefits flowing from student body diversity.
Read more
What is the responsibility of a public educational institution when it receives a public records request for material that it believes it must keep private under state and federal student records laws?
Read more
Read less

News & Press

Press Release Thumbnail Mintz

187 Mintz attorneys have been recognized by Best Lawyers® in the 2025 edition of The Best Lawyers in America©. Notably, three Mintz attorneys received 2025 “Lawyer of the Year” awards, and 64 firm attorneys were included in the 2025 edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch.

Press Release Thumbnail Mintz

Seven Mintz attorneys were recognized in Benchmark Litigation’s 2024 “40 & Under List” which spotlights the “top emerging talent in litigation” who are 40 years old and under. The annual “40 & Under List” is compiled through peer and client review, as well as consideration of individual cases.

Press Release Thumbnail Mintz

Mintz proudly announced the election of 13 attorneys to Members and the addition of a record-setting 22 new lateral Members in 2023, with 11 Partners in the newly opened Toronto office. This diverse group strengthens Mintz’s core areas, spanning Commercial and IP Litigation, Life Sciences, Tech, Private Equity, and Energy & Sustainability. The elevated Members and new lateral additions bring invaluable expertise to help clients navigate complex legal landscapes. 

Press Release Thumbnail Mintz

Mintz is pleased to announce that 32 attorneys have been named Massachusetts Super Lawyers and 27 attorneys have been named Massachusetts Rising Stars for 2023.

Press Release Thumbnail Mintz

Mintz is pleased to announce that 120 firm attorneys have been recognized as leaders by Best Lawyers® in the 2024 edition of The Best Lawyers in America©.

Press Release Thumbnail Mintz

Associate Mathilda McGee-Tubb has been named a White Collar Rising Star by Law360. She was chosen for her role representing Amin Khoury in the "Operation Varsity Blues" litigation.

Press Release Thumbnail Mintz

BOSTON – Mintz is pleased to announce that two of its attorneys have been included in Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly 2023 ‘Excellence In Law’ recognition.

News Thumbnail Mintz

Mintz Associate Mathilda McGee- Tubb was quoted in an article published by Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly about the Appeals Court’s decision in In the Matter of the Leo Kahn Revocable Trust.

Press Release Thumbnail Mintz

35 Mintz attorneys have been named Massachusetts Super Lawyers and 25 Mintz attorneys have been named Massachusetts Rising Stars for 2022.

Press Release Thumbnail Mintz

Best Lawyers® recognized 108 firm attorneys in the 2023 edition of The Best Lawyers in America©. Notably, two Mintz attorneys – Poonam Patidar and Scott M. Stanton – received 2023 “Lawyer of the Year” awards, and 28 firm attorneys were included in the inaugural edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch.

Press Release Thumbnail Mintz

Mintz, along with co-counsel Black Srebnick PA, secured a full acquittal on all charges brought against client Amin Khoury, who had been charged with conspiracy to commit mail fraud, honest services fraud and federal programs bribery. The trial was the final case tied to the nationwide college admissions scandal known as “Operation Varsity Blues,” and the only case out of 57 to end in an acquittal. Every other defendant was convicted following a guilty plea or trial.

News Thumbnail Mintz
Kim V. Marrkand, Mintz Member and Founder and Co-Chair of the firm’s Insurance Practice, authored an article published in April 2021 by the Tort, Trial & Insurance Practice Law Journal, a publication of the American Bar Association’s Tort Trial and Insurance Practice Section, that examined Section 12 of the American Law Institute’s Restatement of the Law, Liability Insurance, titled “Liability of Insurer for Conduct of Defense”, wherein Ms. Marrkand shows that Section 12 “invents wholly new rules and a cause of action without either the support of existing case law or compelling policy rationale.” Mintz Associates Mathilda McGee-Tubb and Clare Prober provided significant contributions to the article.
Press Release Thumbnail Mintz
Pro bono litigation team recognized for work to achieve groundbreaking victory for immigrants’ rights and mentorship provided to the legal community.
News Thumbnail Mintz
An article published by Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly reported that a victory secured in federal court by lawyers from Mintz and the American Civil Liberties Union is having a profound effect on the way bond hearings are conducted in deportation cases. The article included commentary from attorneys on the front lines in the Boston immigration court. One lawyer called the ruling a “breath of fresh air” and a “massive change in the law.”
News Thumbnail Mintz
Articles published by Law360 and MassLive reported that Mintz, together with the ACLU of Massachusetts and the ACLU of New Hampshire, achieved a groundbreaking victory for immigrants’ rights when Chief U.S. District Judge Patti B. Saris ruled that the government’s practice of detaining certain immigrants by default violates both due process and the Administrative Procedure Act.

The first-of-its-kind class action lawsuit, Pereira Brito v. Barr, was filed in June on behalf of immigrants who were jailed due to flawed detention hearings in which the detainee was required to bear the burden of proof as to not being a flight risk or a danger to the community. The latest ruling holds that the class of immigrants are entitled to bond hearings at which the government bears the burden of justifying an immigrant’s detention, and at which the immigration court must consider someone’s ability to pay when setting a bond amount.

The Mintz pro bono team representing the plaintiffs in this case includes Members Susan Finegan and Susan Cohen, Special Counsel Andrew Nathanson, and Associates Mathilda McGee-Tubb, Jennifer Mather McCarthy, and Ryan Dougherty.
News Thumbnail Mintz
Law360 covered a summary judgment argument by lawyers from Mintz and the American Civil Liberties Union in a class action lawsuit, Pereira Brito v. Barr, challenging the government’s practice of denying due process to detained immigrants.
An article published by Law360 covered a motion hearing in a class action lawsuit, Pereira Brito v. Barr, filed by Mintz, together with the ACLU of Massachusetts and the ACLU of New Hampshire, challenging the government’s practice of denying due process to detained immigrants.
News Thumbnail Mintz
Mintz attorneys, Mathilda McGee-Tubb and Joshua Briones, author this article which addresses the case before the Ninth Circuit, where Facebook contends that a BIPA class action would violate federal due process, because it could result in a huge statutory damages award untethered to any injury, and inconsistent with BIPA’s legislative intent. If Facebook succeeds in this argument, it will open the door to other defendants doing the same.

Read less

Mathilda is a multifaceted litigator who solves clients’ business disputes and personal challenges through creative solutions driven by each client’s particular priorities. She is equally comfortable as an advocate in the courtroom and the boardroom.

Mathilda’s practice encompasses complex commercial litigation, class actions, white-collar criminal and administrative investigations, trust and estate litigation, appellate litigation, and insurance coverage disputes. She has repeatedly obtained favorable pre-trial resolutions and won cases on motions to dismiss, at summary judgment, and following trial. Mathilda’s appellate experience uniquely positions her to help clients anticipate and navigate potential appellate issues as well.

Recognition & Awards

  • Law360: Rising Star - White Collar (2023)

  • Best Lawyers in America "Ones to Watch": Appellate Practice (2022-2025) 

  • Best Lawyers in America "Ones to Watch": Commercial Litigation (2021-2025) 

  • Massachusetts Super Lawyers: Rising Star (2021 - 2023)

  • Best Lawyers in America "Ones to Watch": Mass Tort Litigation / Class Actions - Defendants (2021-2025) 

  • Best Lawyers in America "Ones to Watch": Criminal Defense: White-Collar (2024-2025)

  • Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly: Up & Coming Lawyer Honoree (2023)

  • Richard Mintz Pro Bono Award (2019)

  • Benchmark Litigation: 40 & Under Hot List (2024)

  • Lawyers for Civil Rights, Pro Bono Award (2016 and 2019)

  • Order of the Coif

  • McGrath & Kane Award, Boston College Law School (2013)

Read less

Mathilda is a multifaceted litigator who solves clients’ business disputes and personal challenges through creative solutions driven by each client’s particular priorities. She is equally comfortable as an advocate in the courtroom and the boardroom.

Mathilda’s practice encompasses complex commercial litigation, class actions, white-collar criminal and administrative investigations, trust and estate litigation, appellate litigation, and insurance coverage disputes. She has repeatedly obtained favorable pre-trial resolutions and won cases on motions to dismiss, at summary judgment, and following trial. Mathilda’s appellate experience uniquely positions her to help clients anticipate and navigate potential appellate issues as well.

Involvement

  • Fellow, American Bar Foundation
  • Trustee, The Chestnut Hill School (2023- present)
  • Member, Subcommittee on Alternative Paths to Admission of the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court’s Steering Committee on Bar Admissions (2021- present)
  • Board Member, Lawyers for Civil Rights (2020- present)
  • Gubernatorial Appointee, Metropolitan Area Planning Council (2018– present)
  • Associate Editor, ABA Tort, Trial & Insurance Practice Law Journal (2021- 2023)
  • Member, Boston Bar Association Civil Rights & Civil Liberties Section Steering Committee (2020- 2022)
  • Member, Supreme Judicial Court Law Clerks’ Society Governing Board (2015- 2022)
  • Member, Boston Bar Association Public Interest Leadership Program, Class of 2019- 2020
  • Vice Chair and Board Member, Apprentice Learning (2016– 2019)
  • At-Large Member, Oberlin College Alumni Leadership Council (2016– 2019)
  • Member, ONEin3 Advisory Council to Mayor Thomas M. Menino (2013- 2014)
  • Member, Executive Board & Nominations Committee, Oberlin Alumni Association (2011- 2014)
  • Class Trustee, Oberlin College (2007- 2010)
Read less