Employment
Viewpoints
Filter by:
Supreme Court Clarifies the Meaning “Salary Basis” Under Federal Overtime Law
March 3, 2023 | Blog | By Brendan Lowd, Kathryn Droumbakis
FTC Hosts Forum on Proposed Rule to Ban Noncompete Clauses
March 2, 2023 | Blog | By Danielle Dillon, Marc Aspis
National Labor Relations Board Warns Employers to Pare Back Overbroad Non-Disparagement and Confidentiality Provisions in Severance Agreements
February 24, 2023 | Blog | By Delaney Busch, Evan Piercey, Michael Arnold
Federal Court Kicks California Arbitration Ban to the Curb
February 21, 2023 | Blog | By Jennifer Rubin, Kevin Kim
Employers Making FLSA Administrative Exemption Classification Determinations Should Make Note of a New First Circuit Case
February 13, 2023 | Blog | By Brendan Lowd, Kathryn Droumbakis
New Illinois Leave Law: Paid Leave for Any Reason
February 7, 2023 | Blog | By Michael Arnold, Danielle Bereznay
Finally, Judicial Guidance Interpreting the Massachusetts Noncompetition Agreement Act
February 7, 2023 | Blog | By Geri Haight, Natalie C. Groot, Danielle Dillon
Deploying A Holistic Approach to Automated Employment Decision-Making in light of NYC’s AEDT Law
February 3, 2023 | Blog | By Michelle Capezza, Corbin Carter, Evan Piercey
Final Regulations Issued by Massachusetts Department of Family and Medical Leave – Health Maintenance During Leave
February 1, 2023 | Blog | By Patricia Moran
Revisiting the Extraterritorial Reach of Equal Employment Opportunity Laws for U.S. Employers
January 31, 2023 | Blog | By Natalie C. Groot, Danielle Bereznay
Employees’ Perspective on Source and Use for Series Financings and Acquisitions
January 26, 2023 | Blog | By Benjamin Ferrucci, Marc Aspis
California Answers (Some) Pay Transparency Questions
January 11, 2023 | Blog | By Jennifer Rubin, Kevin Kim
FTC Seeks to Ban Non-Competes: What it Means for Businesses & Employees
January 6, 2023 | Blog | By David Lagasse, Marc Aspis, Danielle Bereznay, Danielle Dillon
Congress Expands Protections for Pregnant and Nursing Employees
January 4, 2023 | Blog | By Kevin Kim
Expanding Coverage and Increasing Retirement Savings with the SECURE 2.0 Act
December 23, 2022 | Blog | By Michelle Capezza
2022 Roundup: New York Employment Law Legislation
December 23, 2022 | Blog | By Michelle Capezza, Corbin Carter, Evan Piercey
2022 has been an eventful year for New York employers, as the State and City have instituted a variety of new employment laws. Top of mind are New York City’s Salary Transparency Act and New York City’s sweeping regulation of automated employment decision tools; but we have also seen other laws emerge that may have missed employers’ radars. As 2022 comes to a close, we highlight below some of these important new developments.
New York State Enacts Pay Transparency Law
December 23, 2022 | Blog | By Evan Piercey, Corbin Carter, Michael Arnold
On December 21, 2022, Governor Hochul signed into law S.9427-A/A.10477, which requires all private sector New York employers to list salary ranges for all advertised jobs and postings. This law takes effect on September 17, 2023.
Newly Enacted Federal “Speak Out Act” Limits Use of Some Sexual Harassment NDAs
December 9, 2022 | Blog | By Corbin Carter, Michael Arnold
President Biden has signed into law the federal "Speak Out Act" limiting the enforceability of pre–dispute non-disclosure and non-disparagement clauses covering sexual assault and sexual harassment disputes. The Act takes effect immediately.
The Massachusetts Department of Family and Medical Leave to Hold Public Hearing on Proposed Regulations on Wednesday, December 7, 2022
December 5, 2022 | Blog | By Patricia Moran
As described in more detail in our prior post, the Massachusetts Department of Family and Medical Leave (DFML) recently posted proposed changes to its Paid Family and Medical Leave (MAPFML) regulations. Mintz attorney Patricia Moran gives updates on these changes which are intended to clarify the employer’s obligation to maintain employment-related health insurance benefits during MAPFML leave.
NYC Proposes Rules in Advance of 2023 Automated Employment Decision Tools Law
November 4, 2022 | Blog | By Corbin Carter, Michelle Capezza, Evan Piercey
Effective January 1, 2023, New York City employers will be prohibited from using artificial intelligence in employment decision-making processes unless they take a number of specific and affirmative steps prior to doing so, including a bias audit of the tool. These requirements have emerged following the passage of New York City Local Law 144 in December 2021, which creates a specific regime employers must adhere to in order to utilize automated employment decision tools, which the City has referred to as “AEDTs”. Many questions emerged following the passage of Local Law 144 and in response to some of these inquiries, the City’s Department of Consumer and Worker Protection (“DCWP”) has proposed rules that provide some answers, expand upon Local Law 144, and regulate the use of AEDTs. Mintz attorneys Corbin Carter, Michelle Capezza and Evan Piercey analyze and discuss these proposed rules.
Explore Other Viewpoints:
- Data Centers & Digital Infrastructure
- AI: The Washington Report
- Antitrust and Federal Regulation
- Appellate
- Arbitration, Mediation & Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Artificial Intelligence
- Awards
- Bankruptcy & Restructuring
- California Land Use
- Cannabis
- Class Action
- Complex Commercial Litigation
- Construction
- Consumer Product Safety
- Consumer Protection Defense
- Corporate Governance (ESG)
- Crisis Management and Strategic Response
- Cross-Border Asset Recovery
- DEI Legal Developments
- Debt Financing
- Direct Investing (M&A)
- Diversity
- EB-5 Financing
- Education & Nonprofits
- Employment
- EnforceMintz
- Environmental (ESG)
- Environmental Enforcement Defense
- Environmental Law
- Environmental, Social, and Corporate Governance (ESG)
- FDA Regulatory
- FDA in Flux
- False Claims Act
- Federal Circuit Appeals
- Financial Institution Litigation
- Government Law
- Growth Equity
- Health Care
- Health Care Compliance, Fraud and Abuse, & Regulatory Counseling
- Health Care Enforcement & Investigations
- Health Care Transactions
- Health Information Privacy & Security
- IP Due Diligence
- IPRs & Other Post Grant Proceedings
- Immigration
- Impacts of a New US Administration
- Insolvency & Creditor Rights Litigation
- Institutional Investor Class Action Recovery
- Insurance & Financial Services
- Insurance Consulting & Risk Management
- Insurance and Reinsurance Problem-Solving & Dispute Resolution
- Intellectual Property
- Investment Funds
- Israel
- Licensing & Technology Transactions
- Life Sciences
- Litigation & Investigations
- M&A Litigation
- ML Strategies
- Managed Care
- Medicare, Medicaid and Commercial Coverage & Reimbursement
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- Patent Litigation
- Patent Prosecution & Strategic Counseling
- Pharmacy Benefits and PBM Contracting
- Portfolio Companies
- Privacy & Cybersecurity
- Private Client
- Private Equity
- Pro Bono
- Probate & Fiduciary Litigation
- Products Liability & Complex Tort
- Projects & Infrastructure
- Public Finance
- Real Estate Litigation
- Real Estate Litigation, Construction & Infrastructure
- Real Estate Transactions
- Retail & Consumer Products
- Securities & Capital Markets
- Securities Litigation
- Social (ESG)
- Special Purpose Acquisition Company (SPACs)
- Sports & Entertainment
- State Attorneys General
- Strategic IP Monetization & Licensing
- Sustainable Energy & Infrastructure
- Tax
- Technology
- Technology, Communications & Media
- Technology, Communications & Media Litigation
- Trade Secrets
- Trademark & Copyright
- Trademark Litigation
- Unified Patent Court (UPC)
- Value-Based Care
- Venture Capital & Emerging Companies
- White Collar Defense & Government Investigations
- Women's Health and Technology













